Twenty 20 Blog

Yuvraj Singh’s exploits in the Twenty20 format have grabbed the attention of the New South Wales Blues.

According to a top NSW player, the management is likely to get in touch with Yuvraj and see if they can use the southpaw’s power-hitting in the domestic Twenty20 tournament, which runs from December 28, 2009 to January 23, 2010.

“He’s a great player, and he’s been magnificent in conditions across the world, so if we can get him, it’ll give us a great chance at the title,” said the cricketer.

NSW are the 2008-09 Big Bash champions, and are currently in India for the Champions League Twenty20. The team already boasts of Australian internationals Simon Katich, David Warner and Phillip Hughes at the top of the order. When not on national duty, Michael Clarke and wicketkeeper Brad Haddin bolster the middle-order. A full-strength bowling line-up would feature stalwarts like Brett Lee, Stuart Clark, Nathan Bracken, Nathan Hauritz and the up-and-coming pace sensation, Doug Bollinger. A recent addition to that list is Australia’s current No.1 all-rounder, Shane Watson, who has moved to NSW from Queensland.

But ten of their 36-member squad for the season are bound by Cricket Australia contracts. This is the reason why the Blues have earlier expressed interest in signing Pakistan’s star all-rounder Shahid Afridi and Sri Lanka skipper Kumar Sangakkara. Either of those players, combined with Yuvraj, would give the Sydney-based team a boost in a bid to retain their title, since most of NSW’s first XI will be in contention for berths in the Australian side, which hosts West Indies and Pakistan between November and February.

Read More >

Thrilling contests will be the order of the day at the Champions Trophy, especially following a raging debate over the future of one-day cricket.

The 11-year-old tournament may have witnessed many nail-biting matches, but is still competing with the 50-over World Cup and Twenty20 World Championships for popularity and glamour.

Wisden described the 2006 edition — held just five months before the World Cup — as “the unwanted stepchild of international cricket”, while Matthew Hayden recently suggested the tournament be scrapped.

“Playing the World Twenty20 every other year is too much. And why have the Champions Trophy when you’ve already got a 50-over World Cup?” former Australian batsman Hayden wrote in a newspaper column.

The biennial tournament, a brainchild of former International Cricket Council (ICC) chief Jagmohan Dalmiya, has already had more than its fair share of criticism since it was launched in 1998 in Dhaka.

The event was known as ICC Knock-Out at Dhaka and at Nairobi two years later, but its format left a lot to be desired as just one bad match sent the favourites home, like Australia.

Read More >

Andrew Flintoff’s upcoming retirement has provoked cynical rumblings across the land as to the motives of England’s talisman. In an age where money talks most, many feel that Flintoff’s focus has been drawn from his country to the millions he can earn if fully fit and available for next year’s IPL. This may well be the case and if so who can blame him after an injury-ravaged 4 years which has seen him spend more time on the operating table than on a cricket field. Aussie stars Hayden and Gilchrist have already quit the international arena for domestic Twenty20 and the promise of a few more big paydays on the sub-continent.

However while these players were coming to the end of glittering international careers anyway (in Flintoff’s case it was becoming a question of which tendon would fail next) there’s a worrying line of thought that players might start to quit at an earlier age to cash on lucrative domestic tournaments and foreign leagues.

Twenty20 $s vs Test cricket prestige

It becomes a case of financial reward against the prestige of Test cricket. Which players are prepared to sacrifice the

Read More >

How about a Twenty20 Test match? Sounds odd but who knows, it could become a reality in future.

As the ICC mulls on ways to save Test cricket from the Twenty20 onslaught, a new format of a two innings Twenty20 match is slowly gaining momentum.

And many former players are not averse to the idea though some of them question whether it would suit the needs of spectators, who have lapped up the slam-bang version for its quick results.

The new format has been mooted by cricket experts and broadly envisages a Twenty20 match in two innings of 20 overs each. In other words, the match will have four innings like in Tests but would be restricted to a total of 80 overs (40 for each team in two innings).

The idea of two innings mainly stems from the fact that it would give an opportunity to top players, who fail in the opening essay to make amends in the second innings.

Moreover, the proposal has innovations like each team would be allowed to make two substitutions in the second

Read More >

John Buchanan, the former Australia coach, has said India’s ‘Fab Four” batsmen - Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly and VVS Laxman - are not suited to Twenty20 cricket. Buchanan, who worked closely with several Indian players during his stint with the Kolkata Knight Riders in the IPL, made these and other observations in his new book, The Future of Cricket: The Rise of Twenty20.

Buchanan was otherwise in praise of Tendulkar - who has opted out of Twenty20 internationals but not the IPL. “Tendulkar has been lauded, and rightly so, as one of the very top batsmen in the history of cricket,” he wrote. “But is he an effective T20 player at this stage of his career?

“In the position he plays - as an opener or No. 3 - the T20 game requires not only the finesse and skills he has, but also the power and domination, an ability to take the bowlers on while being creative. You have to be inventive and fearless. And I don’t see those qualities as part of Sachin’s makeup at this stage of his career. Sachin Tendulkar is still a great player but not in this arena of T20.”

Buchanan had similar views on Tendulkar’s contemporaries, none of whom featured in the ICC World Twenty20 in England.

Read More >

England have been grouped with hosts West Indies and one qualifier in the World Twenty20 tournament in 2010.

The West Indies, who knocked England out of this year’s tournament, will open the competition on 30 April.

Holders Pakistan face Australia and Bangladesh, with Sri Lanka pooled against New Zealand and Zimbabwe.

India take on South Africa and another qualifier, with the tournament, staged in St Lucia, St Kitts, Barbados and Guyana, set to finish on 16 May.

Chris Gayle’s West Indies defeated England at the Super Eight stage in this year’s Twenty20, winning a match in which the winner would qualify from their group.

In a rain-affected contest, an unbeaten partnership of 37 between Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Ramnaresh Sarwan saw the Windies home.

Read More >

With a glittering array of batting talent, the experience of winning in 2007 and huge partisan crowds India were the bookies favourites to win the ICC World Twenty20 2009. Their failure to even make it out of the Super 8s was the biggest shock of the tournament.

So why did India fail to perform?  With all due respect to the likes of Zaheer Khan and RP Singh, it’s the batsmen who win matches in Twenty20 and India’s star-studded line-up were like rabbits in the headlights at times, a fact captain Mahendra Dhoni has acknowledged.

“The bowlers did well but the batting really hasn’t been up to the mark. With the batsmen, if the top three don’t click it becomes very hard.”

The loss of Sehwag hit India hard

A lot of people underestimated just how much the loss of injured opener Virender Sehwag would affect the team. Sehwag is a proven performer on the biggest stage and India missed his ability to set the tone of an innings and make the best attacks look ordinary. Momentum is huge in Twenty20 and without Sehwag, India lacked experience at the

Read More >

When cricket historians look back in years to come they may well decide that 2009 was the year that the Twenty20 format came of age. They will say this was the year when the unruly offspring joined the accepted family of cricket’s formats.

Perhaps not regarded as the ultimate test of a team’s ability, that will surely always be the five-match five-day Test series, but still a valid and recognised method of sorting out the cricketing men from the boys.

Why 2009? You may ask. Well two reasons. First the IPL was moved from its natural home in India due to security reasons for its second season prompting a multitude of questions.

Could the organisers and the South Africans hosts put on the event at such short notice? Yes, they could. Would it be as exciting as the inaugural season? Yes. Would the passion of the crowds transfer to South Africa? Would the playing standards reach the same levels? Would the best in the world still be queuing up to appear? Yes, yes and yes.

But there was one important question that was answered no. Would it surpass and replace international cricket?

Read More >

Tim Evershed of Twenty20Blog.co.uk shares his ultimate World Twenty20 2009 team, in batting order:

1) Tillakaratne Dilshan

Dilshan was the worthy winner of the ICC’s Player of the Tournament award and despite his failure in the final we had no hesitation in putting him first on our team of the World Cup.
His stats are compelling enough, most runs in the tournament (317), highest score (96), and average of 56 and a strike rate of 144.75.
But Dilshan’s story was about more than just numbers, he was the rock of Sri Lanka’s batting – scoring well over half the team total in the semi against West Indies – and he did it in style. To cap it all he invented a new shot and had it named after him, the gravity-defying ‘Dilscoop’ and was agonisingly short of the only century of the tournament.

2) Chris Gayle

If the tournament needed setting alight, which is arguable after The Netherlands win over England in the opener, it was Gayle that lit the blue touch paper with his innings at The Oval on the second day. Six sixes and six fours, the 88 he scored off the Australian bowlers was a thing of savage beauty.

Read More >

As befits a game where the importance of every scrambled single, every dropped catch and every dot ball is magnified, the players within the boundary rope were not the only ones feeling the pressure as the ICC World Twenty20 Cup began inauspiciously almost a fortnight ago. When drizzle came down at Lord’s, Alesha Dixon put away her microphone and the opening ceremony was cancelled, the doom mongers who predicted the tournament would fail to catch the public imagination were sharpening their pencils.

Everyone from ECB chairman Giles Clarke, praying it would help banish thoughts of a tumultuous winter, to sports minister Gerry Sutcliffe, hoping it could kick off a so-called “golden decade” of British sporting events in style, was looking worried. Two weeks later, it is a very different story. Outside the Oval yesterday, fans were effusive in their praise. John Fisher, sporting an England shirt, said it had been “brilliant” and was simply “a great day out”. His friend Tony Koodie, backing the West Indies, added: “It’s great value for money, great entertainment. It brings in the kids, and there’s a lot more women.” They were agreed on one other thing, however: “The dancers are dreadful!” After that soggy opening, the sun has shone, both metaphorically and literally. Twenty20 has come of age as a sporting proposition as well as an entertainment one and, after a winter of discontent that took in the Stanford debacle and security concerns sparked by the Lahore attack on the Sri Lanka team bus, international cricket’s feelgood factor is back.

Read More >